Morning Report

Vital Statistics:

	Last	Change	Percent
S&P Futures	1282.1	-27.1	-2.07%
Eurostoxx Index	2076.9	-42.0	-1.98%
Oil (WTI)	83	-3.5	-4.08%
LIBOR	0.468	0.001	0.21%
US Dollar Index (DXY)	83.31	0.266	0.32%
10 Year Govt Bond Yield	1.46%	-0.10%
RPX Composite Real Estate Index	177.4	-0.1

Ugly.  That is all you can say this morning.  Equity markets are reeling after a slew of disappointing economic reports this morning.  The 10-year is trading at 1.46%. MBS are trading higher as well. The German 2-year bund actually has a negative yield.

The unemployment rate ticked up to 8.2% and the economy added just 69,000 jobs last month. The labor force participation rate rose to 63.8%, reversing April's decline. The average workweek declined, which bodes ill for future hiring.

With the massive rally in the 10-year, you would think Operation Twist would be put on the back burner. You would be wrong. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston head Eric Rosengren is advocating continuing Operation Twist (where the Fed buys long-dated bonds and sells short-dated paper in an attempt to lower long-term rates). Given the massive rally we have experienced in the 10 year, May's jobs report should have been great. Anyone think June's report is going to be great?

Facebook's IPO is instructive in that it shows how the relationship between issuer and bank has become more important than the relationship between investor and investment bank. Many moons ago, when I was in business school, we used to ask why IPOs popped so much on day 1. A pop in the stock meant that issuers were leaving money on the table. One explanation was that while an investment bank would get a deal from an issuer maybe once every few years, they had to deal with their buy-side clients every day. So they were more interested in keeping Fidelity happy than they were in keeping XYZ.com happy. Which meant IPOs were usually under-priced.

Fast forward to today:  Facebook was a disaster if you were an investor. But the investor's loss was Facebook's gain. The banks managed to sell as many shares as possible at as high a price as possible. What has changed?  IMO commissions and spreads. When I started in the business, institutions paid a nickle a share to trade a stock. Bid/Ask spreads were 1/8. Sales and trading was a lucrative business that was conducted over the phone.  Nowadays, you can trade inside the penny spread, and commissions are 1/4 of a cent a share. Everything is automated. Sales and trading is a loss-leader business, which means banks are more interested in keeping issuers happy than they are keeping investors happy. If Fidelity is mad, who cares?  Morgan Stanley isn't making anything from them anyway...