A place where economics, financial markets, and real estate intersect.
Showing posts with label OCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OCC. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Morning Report: The OCC solicits input for CRA modernization

Vital Statistics:


LastChange
S&P futures2897-4.25
Eurostoxx index379.06-3.45
Oil (WTI)71.131.33
10 year government bond yield2.88%
30 year fixed rate mortgage4.55%

Stocks are lower this morning on no real news. Bonds and MBS are down small. 

The highlight of the upcoming week will be the jobs report on Friday, although we will get a lot of Fed-speak on Wednesday. Productivity and costs on Thursday will be an important report as well. 

Construction spending rose 0.1% which was lower than the Street 0.4% expectation. Residential construction rose 0.6% MOM and 6.6% YOY. 

Manufacturing expanded in August, according to the ISM PMI Index. The August PMI increased 3.1% to 61.3, driven by increases in production and new orders. Employment rose as well. Many of the participants noted that trade is injecting some uncertainty into their business, especially with respect to price negotiations with suppliers. The reading of 61.3 is unusually strong, and is typically associated with 5.6% GDP growth. 

The OCC is asking for input regarding the CRA and modernization. “As a long-time banker, I have seen firsthand the benefit of CRA investment and how it makes communities vibrant. I applaud the effort of community development practitioners and bankers who work together to make an important difference in our nation’s neighborhoods,” said Comptroller of the Currency Joseph M. Otting. “I have also seen how limitations in the current CRA regulation can fail to provide consideration to a bank that wants to lend and invest in a community with a need for capital, including many low- and moderate-income areas. Unfortunately, the operation of the current CRA regulation can result in restricted resources. It is time for a national discussion on how we can make the CRA work better.”

The ANPR solicits comment on a number of questions regarding improvements to the CRA regulations related to
  • increasing lending and services to people and in areas that need it most, including in LMI areas;
  • clarifying and expanding the types of activities eligible for CRA consideration;
  • revisiting how assessment areas are defined and used;
  • establishing metric-based thresholds for CRA ratings;
  • making bank CRA performance more transparent;
  • improving the timeliness of regulatory decisions related to CRA; and
  • reducing the cost and burden related to evaluating performance under the CRA.
Donald Trump was jawboning Canada over trade and threatening China with $200 million in higher tariffs. I think markets are pretty much shrugging off trade threats any more. Note that Trump will need legislation to carry out some of the changes he wants to make with Canada, which isn't going to happen. 

Home prices increased 0.3% MOM and 6.2% YOY in July, according to CoreLogic. They are forecast to rise about 5% over the upcoming year. We are seeing sellers in the hot markets decide to pull properties off the market to see if they can ride the home price appreciation for a bit longer. This is adding to the supply crunch. CoreLogic's model always seems to predict a slowdown in home price appreciation that never seems to materialize. 



An interesting tidbit - the median lot size fell to 8.560 square feet in 2017 (about 1/5 of an acre). Lot sizes had been trending downward, but climbed during the bubble years as more and more building was done in the exurbs. New England has the largest lot sizes at about 0.4 acres, while the left coast has the smallest (.15 acres). Note this study is only looking at single family spec homes. It looks like this is basically a secular trend, and the the bubble years (building in the exurbs) was largely a blip. It also could be a function of building activity being dominated in regions (like the West Coast), where lots are smaller.  


The ultra-high end luxury market has been getting whacked as foreign investors step away. Changes in tax laws might be having an impact, but it could have also been driven by overbuilding at the top end. I suspect it is the latter, since we are seeing softness in states like Florida which benefit from the tax law. 

Friday, June 8, 2018

Morning Report: Dec Fed funds futures still leaning towards 3 hikes this year

Vital Statistics:

Last Change
S&P futures 2767 -8.25
Eurostoxx index 385.56 -0.38
Oil (WTI) 65.78 -0.17
10 Year Government Bond Yield 2.93%
30 Year fixed rate mortgage 4.59%

Markets are lower this morning on negative news out of Apple. Bonds and MBS are down small. 

Something to watch: We are seeing bigger bets against emerging markets currencies and some European bonds. These trades will bump up against Treasury shorts, which were increased last week in the wake of the Italian election results. One of the biggest trades in the hedge fund community is short Treasuries - which means hedge funds are betting on rising rates. A sell-off in Euro bonds and emerging markets will add buying pressure to Treasuries on the flight to quality trade. So, expect some volatility in Treasuries as fast money enters and exits the market.

Rising interest rates are creating another phenomenon - increased flows into money market funds. Money market funds had been a moribund asset class after the crisis, with interest rates at 0% and the memories of breaking the buck still fresh in many investors minds. Money market funds are seeing the biggest inflows since 2013. Expect to see more of this as bond investors also look for ways to shorten duration. This is yet another reason why hedge funds are short Treasuries. 

After the Italian led drop in rates, the market adjusted its prediction for the Fed Funds rate. Still sitting at a 60-40 bet for 3 or less hikes this year / 4 or more. 



Warren Buffett and Jamie Dimon are exceedingly bullish on the US economy. "Right now, there's no question: It's feeling strong. I mean, if we're in the sixth inning, we have our sluggers coming to bat right now" is how Warren Buffet characterized it. Jamie Dimon's view: "The way I look at it, there is nothing that is a real pothole," he said. "Business sentiment is almost at the highest level it's ever been, consumer sentiment is at its highest levels, markets are wide open, housing's in short supply and my guess is mortgage credit will expand a little bit."

Buffett and Dimon are also arguing for companies to stop providing earnings guidance. They claim that focusing on short term quarterly earnings causes companies to de-emphasize long-term growth. Berkshire Hathaway does not provide any sort of guidance to the Street. It is an interesting idea, however companies provide guidance to the Street because investors as a general rule prefer predictable companies to unpredictable ones. 

How not to "teach your servicer a lesson." Yikes. If you think your lender is making a mistake, or you are unhappy with the service, don't stop paying as a means of retaliation. 

The OCC is taking a more constructive approach with the banks. At the top of the agenda: re-writing community reinvestment rules to be less onerous for the industry. Obama's head of the OCC was a career regulator who made a point of challenging the perception that the OCC was too close to the banks it regulated. The Obama administration pushed hard for banks to take less credit risk, and I wonder how much of the issue with a lack of housing construction is due to that. While this wouldn't affect the Lennars of the world, most construction is with smaller builders who would have to go to their local community bank for financing. 

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Morning Report - Undiversified Bond Investment?

Vital Statistics:

Last Change Percent
S&P Futures  1558.1 1.3 0.08%
Eurostoxx Index 2633.5 21.0 0.80%
Oil (WTI) 96.39 -0.2 -0.20%
LIBOR 0.283 -0.001 -0.35%
US Dollar Index (DXY) 83.07 -0.148 -0.18%
10 Year Govt Bond Yield 1.85% 0.01%  
RPX Composite Real Estate Index 190.5 -0.3  

Markets are flattish on the last trading day of the quarter. 4Q GDP was revised upward from + .1% to + .4%. Personal consumption was revised downward as well.  Initial Jobless Claims rose last week to 357k. Bonds and MBS are flat.

The bond markets close at 1:00 pm EST today. Expect very little action today as traders will probably flatten positions ahead of quarter end.

The Office of Comptroller of the Currency has released the 4Q mortgage performance metrics. 89.4% of all mortgages are current, up from 88.6% last year. Delinquencies and foreclosures are down as the pipeline gets cleared and real estate prices start rebounding. More and more servicers are turning to mods as opposed to foreclosure initiations. The recidivism rate on these mods is around 17%.

The Private Label Securitization market is returning faster than people thought. Prior to this year, the only deals were the occasional Redwood Trust jumbo deal.  JP Morgan recently announced a deal, and now Springleaf plans a $1 billion subprime deal. The palette of products originators can offer is expanding in a big way.

FHFA has made mods easier to do on delinquent mortgages - anyone who is more than 90 days delinquent is automatically eligible for a loan mod. Borrowers do not have to show a financial hardship any more. This will only apply to Fan and Fred loans, and mods will be rate / term, not principal reductions. So this begs the question:  Why won't everyone stop paying their mortgage in order to get a mod?  FHFA said they would use existing "screening measures to prevent strategic defaulters."  Whatever that means.

Is your house an undiversified bond investment? Was house price appreciation driven by falling interest rates? And does that mean that when rates start rising house prices will fall again? I would point out that interest rates aren't the only factors affecting home prices - population growth, incomes, the availability of credit, and even global capital flows play a role. He does have a point, which is that a rapid rise in home prices like we saw from the early 90's to 2007 is unlikely to be repeated given that we won't have the tailwind of falling interest rates to increase affordability. That said, low interest rates can last a long time - from the end of WWI to the mid 60's, short-term rates were 5% or lower. From 1932 to the mid 50's, short term rates were under 2.5%.  I would also point out that real estate prices increased during the 1970s, even as short term rates moved up to 15%.